Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness – this is a well-known phrase from the United States Declaration of Independence. I doubt the founding fathers of the new United States in the 1780s envisioned a time could occur when the government would conspire with corporate interests to cause a loss of life, a loss of liberties through dangerous lockdowns and medical mandates, and a complete disregard for the physical, emotional, and mental health of its citizens. All around the world, similar situations are occurring where the medical hierarchy are actively pitting citizens against each other over the issue of whether to get a jab, or not, to stop the threat of a virus. This is not simply one groups belief versus another groups opposite belief. Each group believes that they are acting in the public interest to safeguard people. The choices we make at this time can and do have serious consequences, and so should not be taken lightly.
It’s important that you understand both sides of the issue about being jabbed or not for the C19 issue. Simply believing one side of the issue without looking in to the real data and not considering the opposite perspective can have dangerous consequences. My perspective should be obvious (I do not support getting any of the jabs rolled out for C19) but I will outline the main points used by both sides. The jab proponents believe that these jabs are tested and that no one would submit them to a medical intervention that would harm them. Most also believe that C19 is a real threat and that by submitting to the jab they will be immunized and the world will begin to get back to the old normal. The other side believe that the jabs are still too experimental and untested and that there are extensive major adverse effects. Many believe that the draconian lockdowns coupled with the apparently nefarious medical protocols introduced around the world that there is a dark and deeper agenda from an authoritarian system that does not have our best interests at heart. The information used by both sides is different. Pro-jabbers believe the singular mainstream narrative and most support active censorship of ‘misinformation’ to prevent people becoming hurt, support mandates and vaccine passports to ensure safety in public areas, and are willing to lose certain freedoms in order to ensure overall safety. Anti-jabbers use alternative media, which they feel can be validated, and support open discussion of all alternative perspectives. They resist attempts to control their health freedom that means jab mandates and draconian restrictions on their movements and social engagements. Obviously if you have read any of my blog posts, I support the latter – my reasoning below.
To start with, while I support pharmaceutical research (after all I worked with them in a university setting for over 25 years), new drugs have extensive testing and continual research to determine safety in which the companies are legally liable for any fraud or drug adverse effects that show up in the population. Vaccines, however, fall into a totally different category. Companies that produce them are completely off the hook for any problems, testing tends to be minimized to only meet legal requirements, and there are many nefarious practices for vacs that are dismissed by the mainstream media.
Big Pharma is driven by greed, and they need the world in a chronic state of health to ensure that they are able to continually supply drugs. This is especially true when it comes to vaccines. As such they own and control the narrative of drug research and prescription delivery system, and they vertically control the vaccine industry at all levels. The WHO, CDC, FDA, NIH, and most countries health research should be advocates for us, the people, but they are advocates for Big Pharma with intermediaries receiving great royalties for going along with their agenda’s. Big Pharma must love the C19 variants for the vacs since this ensures their narrative of the need to receive booster after booster that will be required.
More on VAEs (Vac adverse effects) that I overviewed in the last post. While literally hundreds of millions of these experimental jabs have been administered worldwide, the numbers of VAEs has also grown proportionally. More than 2 million serious adverse effects (from permanent disabilities to death) have been reported, and these numbers are known to be only some of the many that are actually reported as VAEs. The Harvard Pilgrim study in 2010 concluded that at best only 10% were reported and possibly only as few as 1% are reported. So that 2 million deaths could be 20 million or even 200 million. Any drug that kills 5 people is flagged for further evaluation and if 50 deaths occur from a drug, then it is pulled from the market pending extensive review and further safety testing. The CDCs own numbers list over 11,000 deaths from VAEs, yet the vac rollout continues unabated and with even more pressure from the media and true believers to get jabbed. If that hasn’t raised a concern in your mind, then maybe you need to look more closely at the whole issue.
When medical specialists looked at blood smears under a microscope, normal Red Blood Cells (RBCs) are rounds with dark centers and isolated from each other. RBCs from jabbed individuals show many RBC shape abnormalities, ‘golden tubules’ typical toxic of Graphene Oxide, and aggregates of RBCs. This latter observation is of concern because they resemble ‘Rouleau formations’ that are usually found with medical Conditions including inflammation, infections, multiple myeloma, Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia, inflammatory and connective tissue disorders, and cancers. It also occurs in diabetes mellitus and is one of the causative factors for microvascular occlusion in diabetic retinopathy. At this catching C19 is a better option than the potential of side-effects from the numerous (and largely unknown) ingredients in the jab. And this is besides the mRNA that is resetting your genetic blueprint in your cells. There are so many unknowns and potential harms from these experimental jabs, yet the mainstream media keep parroting the mantra “These jabs are safe and effective” which is a complete lie – they don’t know any more than you do about the safety aspect since it is not tested or still in testing with everyone getting as part of medium and long-term testing. If you make a choice to be jabbed there are consequences that there is no way to reverse any VAEs that occur within the next ten years! There may be treatments to reduce symptoms, but reversal at this point seems unlikely. Humans have never been injected on this scale with mRNA treatments before, and animal studies have shown devastating health problems.
You would think that the MSM would be all about making sure everyone knew about the serious health effects and potential problems. But, no. Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Instagram have all heavily censored and removed many health freedom internet platforms that go against the mainstream / jab narrative. Note that the tyrants who the MSM are also heavily invested and so protect Big Pharma profits). The corruption around this alone should be enough to raise red flags in your mind.
Peter Doshi, Senior editor of The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has many cautionary comments and papers in the BMJ about vaccines that are worth reading if you want to do your own research. E.g., “This “you’re either with us or against us” thinking is unfit for medicine. Many parents who deliberate on decisions regarding their children’s health ultimately make decisions — such as to vaccinate or not vaccinate — with lingering uncertainty about whether they were right. When given a choice, some say yes to some vaccines and no to others. These parents are not zealots, they are decision makers navigating the grey, acting under conditions of uncertainty in perpetual flux. And among those uncertainties are the known and unknown side effects that each vaccine carries. Contrary to the suggestion — generally implicit — that vaccines are risk free (and therefore why would anyone ever resist official recommendations), the reality is that officially sanctioned written medical information on vaccines is — just like drugs — filled with information about common, uncommon, and unconfirmed but possible harms… It’s time to listen — seriously and respectfully — to patients’ concerns, not demonise them.”
When it comes to getting the jab for C19, consider that the survival rate for C19 is over 99% and most people, especially under 65 are either asymptomatic or have minimal ill short-term effects. The risk from the jab is greater than 2% with death or long-term effects more likely and possibly unknown effects to yet occur within the next ten years at least. It’s a choice between perceived benefit versus harm. The consequences are huge. As the Grail Knight says in the Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade film, “Choose, but choose wisely, for while the true Grail will bring you life, the false Grail will take it from you.”
0 Comments