“The forest was shrinking, but the trees kept voting for the ad handle because it was made of wood and they thought it was one of them.” Anon
There seem to be three main areas of geoengineering: 1) modern accepted techniques – Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR). SRM involves using Albedo enhancement to reflect solar heat back to space, Space reflectors that black sunlight before it reaches the Earth (one of the more fanciful techniques is big Mylar sheets orbiting the planets, and then Stratospheric aerosols that introduce aerosol chemicals or even nanoparticles into the upper atmosphere to reflect some sunlight before it reaches the surface of the Earth’s surface. CDR is a fanciful way of saying we keep burning fossil fuels and then use a series of techniques to deal with he effects of carbon dioxide that currently plague us – such as large scale tree planting (even while we decimate rainforests), locking up carbon in the soil through techniques like ‘charring,’ capturing CO2 and staring it in places like salt mines and used methane layers, enhanced weathering to allow minerals to react with CO2 and also allow alkalizing the ocean. ALL geoengineering solutions to deal with the problem of heat and CO2 but not to deal with the inherent problem that caused the situation – the use of fossil fuels to power our world.
Then we have 2) the use of unknown technologies (at least to the mainstream) to manipulate weather events with technologies like HAARP, although the events caused seem to be exacerbating existing conditions rather than ameliorating them. I had to brush up on my meteorology to understand much of what is happening. Here we where we get into other technologies that will certainly get you marginalized should you dare to mention them, 3) Forced adaptive radiating techniques. One such technology is the use of jet condensation trails (contrails) to seed chemicals – known as Chem trails – the seeding of chemicals and biological agents through jet spraying. At first, I had a hard time accepting this as a rational idea , but the more I looked into it the more it bothered me. The vitriolic response to the implication that chem trail exist is all out of proportion. It’s like when the catholic church had accusations that some rogue priests might be using their position to be pedophiliacs. Absolute denial until the evidence kept surfacing and the whole problem popped to the surface. Talk about Chem trails and you risk being ridiculed. Interestingly, the ‘conspiracy’ is split into two camps, believe or don’t believe – there is no middle ground. And the response from mainstream science is quite harsh! The effort given to debunk chem trails is way out of proportion to some conspiracy nuts supporting it. Being a true skeptic I allowed myself to follow this branch of the rabbit hole. The science behind chem trails is not flat-earth stuff that can be readily poo-poked. Is it real? It has some good rationality behind it. I went to the meteorology work to see what the mainstream sceintists had to say about contrails that are accepted.
From the government’s own websites (e.g. NASA, The Royal Meteorological Society) and respected mainstream journals there are numerous studies showing that jet contrails have been an area of concern for many years. When the water vapor in the jet exhaust condenses and freezes in the cold troposphere, there is a buildup of cirrus clouds. The occurrence of contrails relies on supersaturated cold air that allows the contrails to spread and initiate growth of cirrus clouds at high altitude. It is reported that the structure and growth of these clouds varies with atmospheric conditions – i.e. the conditions must be right for this to happen. In cold winter months the appearance of contrails that persist is not unusual. What is unusual is that they are seen to persist when upper tropospheric conditions (as in summer) are warmer and not conducive to contrails remaining in the sky. This is the part that caught my attention. Planes try to fly the most straight a line as possible to get from A-B when above 30,000 ft. They will obviously have to follow set flight lanes and make adjustments for large storm clouds, but generally they fly in straight lines. As such, contrails will also appear in straight lines with minor course adjustments appearing as minor bends in those trajectories. I am making not the assertion that chemtrails are real. What I am doing is giving some observations of my own over the past many years that don’t make sense with the existing meteorological framework of how contrails exist. On some colder days I see contrails making some interesting criss-cross patterns high in the sky as planes go from north to south and west to east, etc… What I also see now are persistent contrails that form in warm weather. I also notice that some of these high-flying jets, fly odd patterns. I attribute these patterns to military jets that will make sharp left and right turns for some reason. The odd fact that some of these jets fly at tangents to regular commercial flights seems very deliberate and is strange. The color of some of these odd contrails is notably different from regular contrails and cannot be explained by refraction of light. The pattern that some of these contrails look like half a zipper confuses me – like something being pulsed into the trail.
Conclusion: I remain on the fence with this one. I would really love to see some hard research that studies the actual contrails for possible contaminants other than water vapor. Since chemtrails are debunked there is no incentive to spend money pacifying the conspiracy community. Do I think that there could be a conspiracy by some global shadow group to control the weather? I don’t put anything past the Cabal. Geoengineering is a big dark hole in which mainstream scientists seem afraid to go. The increase in chaotic weather associated with GCD is real. Is it all just fossil fuel pollution? Or is something else contributing? HAARP is real and yet little is known about it. Many weather control technologies are being proposed, actually in use, or currently being tested to ameliorate the problems of GCD. The military are very interested in weather control, despite international agreements to ban it because of its potential to be devastating.
The largest recorded amount of rainfall in one event within the USA occurred August 2017 with Hurricane Harvey. The storm essentially stalled after it made landfall near Houston producing anywhere between 52-60 inches of torrential rain (depending on where it was measured – gauges were not set up to measure this amount in one dump). I went through a storm in Colorado in 2013 that stalled over the continental decide near the Rocky Mountain national Park because of a front ahead of it in Wyoming. That Colorado storm created widespread flooding in a localized area. I was curious as to what stalled Harvey, especially since meteorological expectations were that it should last 1-2 days and then move northeastwards. I was interested to recall that at the same time there was a record breaking high-pressure heat wave also stalled off the Oregon coast that normally would have swung southeastwards running into the pressure trough created by Harvey thereby displacing it up the country. An amazing coincidence. It’s as amazing as Hurricane Sandy in 2012 taking a sharp left to hit the New York/New Jersey shore. While it hit the shore as a post-tropical cyclone, it was a category 2 out at sea with winds extending 175 miles out from the hurricanes eye making it a storm larger than most of its type. The urgency to enact strict global legislation to protect us from GCD seems paramount to protect us from this increasing climatic disruption.
All wonderful data, but what might it mean? Could anyone or any group actually get any benefit from deliberately manipulating such storms, if that were indeed the case? (There is a growing body of evidence to show that there is advanced technology that has been controlled by the dark state for many decades.) When you join a lot of apparently unconnected dots and get a picture it gets very disconcerting. GCD is a very real threat and the evidence linking it to fossil fuels is very strong. Even to all the deniers I always ask, “what is good about pollution? And why cannot we remove the pollution problem by going to long term and multiple source renewables.” Obviously, the big fossil fuel giants want to control the energy sources – they even name themselves energy companies and not the fossil fuel companies anymore. Yet, I have this niggling thought. What if these global energy corporations state a denial to GCD but actually want to enhance GCD through weather manipulation – I’m pondering aloud here. What would they gain by this approach? Move up to bigger picture than just GCD – is there anything bigger than the planets climate in the future? Eco Umberto’s book Foucault’s Pendulum comes back to mind from an earlier post (Health – Food 2), “The elite create myths in order to debunk myths they don’t like.” I get a sense of the Tom Sawyer and the fence painting story with his friend Ben – deny GCD in order to rally everyone behind promoting an agenda, any agenda, that will solve the crisis. Global corporations and the dark controllers would like everyone to be on board with resolving GCD, but their way through a world government ‘controlling everything’ and not a collection of independent nations working together. Interesting, if you spend enough time down the rabbit hole and open your eyes, it’s not surprising why you start to see things that others are bamboozled into ignoring. When we finally get everyone to the table to fix GCD – including the USA – we need to be aware of controlling interests (always under the guise of benefit for everyone) that insist that some draconian measures must be enacted to fix the issue. We must never lose our sovereignty as citizens of earth to those who would control us for their own gain. (You might want to read some of my earlier post about control if this sounds a little heavy.)
0 Comments